|
|
|
How much UV-B is present in sunlight?
|
|
Under a clear sky at noon, up to 0.5% of the energy reaching the surface of the earth from the sun
consists of biologically active UV-B radiation. The absolute intensity is primarily controlled by
the sun's angle so that, during winter or in the morning and evening, it is only a small fraction of
that at noon in summer.
|
|
|
What factors other than stratospheric ozone control UV-B radiation?
|
|
Significant additional absorption and scattering occurs by clouds, and by ground level pollutants
such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, low-level ozone, and atmospheric aerosols. Clouds can
reduce UV-B radiation at the surface by up to 90%, or even increase it by up to 20%.
Furthermore, the large variability of clouds from year to year makes detection of long-term trends
in UV-B difficult.
|
|
|
Have any long-term trends in UV-B radiation been measured directly?
|
|
Data obtained with early ground-based instruments at eight locations throughout the United
States showed either no change or a slight downward trend in annual UV-B radiation over the
period 1974 to 1985. Although this was initially explained as possibly due to long-term
decreases in local pollution near the sites, recent studies indicate that the apparent decreases in
UV-B might be due to shifts in calibration of the instruments. Short-term increases in UV-B
have, however, resulted from short-term decreases in ozone, for example those which occurred
due to aerosol increases after the 1991 eruption of Mt. Pinatubo, or during ozone declines
associated with the Antarctic ozone hole.
Satellite observations of ozone levels and calculations of clouds from satellite measurements of
reflectivity, used to produce model calculations of UV-B, have indicated statistically significant
increases in UV-B poleward of 40 degrees latitude. However, satellites are not capable of
measuring ground level UV-B directly.
Large scale ground-based monitoring of UV-B has begun in recent years in several countries. At
the present time, the observational record is too short to allow the detection of statistically
significant long-term trends.
|
| |